Elastic Network Adapter (ENA) & Elastic Fabric Adapter (EFA)


Choosing networking options on EC2.




🚀 1. Elastic Network Adapter (ENA)




⚡ 2. Elastic Fabric Adapter (EFA)




🔑 Key Differences

Feature ENA EFA
Protocol TCP/IP stack OS-bypass + MPI (via libfabric)
Latency Low, but limited by TCP/IP Ultra-low (microsecond-level)
Throughput Up to 100 Gbps Up to 100 Gbps (but optimized for small-message, HPC traffic)
Use cases General apps, web servers, DBs, analytics HPC, ML distributed training, tightly coupled workloads
Cluster scaling Scales fine for throughput-heavy apps Scales to thousands of nodes with consistent latency
Complexity Easy — works out of the box Requires HPC/ML apps built for MPI/libfabric



✅ When to Use What

  • Use ENA if:

    • You need general-purpose, high-bandwidth networking.
    • Workloads are fine with TCP/IP latency (databases, streaming, web apps, microservices).
  • Use EFA if:

    • You’re running HPC or distributed ML workloads that rely on MPI-style communication.
    • Your workloads require very low latency and consistent communication between nodes.
    • You want to scale workloads across thousands of EC2 instances efficiently.

👉 Quick analogy:

  • ENA = highway built for moving lots of traffic fast (bulk data transfer).
  • EFA = dedicated racing track for specialized cars (HPC/ML apps needing ultra-low latency).



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *